As part of
the Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA),
changes were made to the law regarding formation and powers of
the Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Committee”).
Typically a Committee is appointed from the list of twenty
largest unsecured creditors filed by a chapter 11 debtor. The
Committee usually is comprised of seven creditors and must be
fairly chosen and representative of the different types of
unsecured claims. The United States Trustee or Bankruptcy
Administrator oversees the formation and appointment of the
Committee. The Committee can hire professionals and plays an
important role in making sure the unsecured creditors are
treated fairly and not prejudiced by actions taken in the case.
Committee
Make-Up
BAPCPA
provides in section 1102(a) (4) that on request of a party in
interest the court may order a change in membership of a
Committee if necessary to ensure adequate representation of
creditors or equity security holders. Also, the court may
increase the number of members to include a “small business
concern” if the creditor holds claims that are
disproportionately large in relation to the creditor’s gross
revenues. This change will enable creditors holding smaller
claims to serve on the Committee. This change likely will not
cause significant problems in small chapter 11 cases, but in the
“mega” cases, the creditors with very large claims and
experience in serving on Committees likely will resist the
addition of smaller creditors.
Just
because a creditor’s claim is significantly smaller than the
claims of other creditors does not mean that the creditor has
less interest in the outcome of a chapter 11 case. If the
amount due from the debtor and whether it is paid will have a
significant outcome on the financial viability of the creditor,
the creditor may be very motivated to serve on the Committee.
Such a creditor should contact the U.S. Trustee or Bankruptcy
Administrator to get on the Committee, but it is likely that the
creditor will be required to file a motion seeking a court order
approving its appointment.
Impact Of
New Administrative Claim
Another
BAPCPA change affecting Committee membership is the
administrative priority now given to trade creditors that
provide credit in the ordinary course of business to the Debtor
within 20 days prior to the Petition Date. If the Debtor does
not properly determine the amount of a creditor’s administrative
claim and includes it in the creditor’s unsecured claim, the
list of the top twenty largest unsecured creditors will be
distorted.
Committee
Duty To Solicit Creditor Comments
Section
1102(b) (3) was added to the Bankruptcy Code to provide that a
Committee must solicit and receive comment from creditors of all
kinds represented by the Committee. The Code does not provide
guidance for a Committee to comply with this new directive. In
large cases, Committees may set up a website to provide
information and solicit information. Updates on case status
could be mailed to creditors periodically. This will be
helpful to creditors who are interested in getting insight on
developments in the case. Of course, the notification of
creditors will increase administrative costs, depending on how
the Committee provides information.
Confidentiality Issues
One of the
biggest concerns created by the new legislation is how to
protect confidential information that the debtor shares with the
Committee. The Committee is often asked to execute
Confidentiality Agreements before the debtor shares sensitive
information regarding operations. In a recent case filed in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (In
re Nobex Corporation, Case No. 05-20050), the debtor
filed a motion seeking an order prohibiting the Committee from
providing confidential information to the creditors. In
particular, the debtor sought protection regarding certain
information related to its primary asset, intellectual
property. An order was entered on February 10, 2006 that
required the Committee to provide to creditors the following
information: general information about the debtor and the
chapter 11 case, highlights of significant events, a calendar of
upcoming events, press releases (if any) issued by the
Committee and the debtor, and other information upon request,
provided that the Committee can use its reasonable
discretion regarding whether to provide information and require
confidentiality agreements. The court found that the Committee
did not have to provide confidential or proprietary information
about the debtor or the Committee, privileged information, or
other information that that would compromise the fiduciary
duties of the Committee. The court also decided that creditors
could submit a written request for information and if that
request was not met by the Committee, the creditor could request
a hearing on a motion to compel the disclosure.
Because
certain information should be protected to enhance a debtor’s
ability to reorganize or maximize the value of its assets at
sale, it is likely that other Bankruptcy Courts will protect the
debtor from dissemination of certain information. Some courts
have indicated a willingness to enter a protective order early
in the case that allows the debtor to share information with the
Committee, yet protects sensitive and attorney-client privileged
information from wide-spread disclosure.
The
changes to the Bankruptcy Code likely will be helpful to
creditors and enable them to have better information and more
input into Committee decisions. Subject to certain limits, the
fiduciary duty of the Committee to all creditors will be
enhanced by the new legal requirements related to membership and
communication.
If you have any questions regarding this article, please contact
Lisa Sumner at
919.783.2869 or
lsumner@poynerspruill.com.
This
electronic publication is published by Poyner & Spruill LLP to provide
general information about significant legal developments. Because the facts in
each situation vary, the legal precedents noted herein may not be applicable to
individual circumstances.