Most employers
understand the need to evaluate accommodations when an employee
with a disability requests some work-related modification.
However, a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit highlights an employer’s obligation to evaluate
reasonable accommodations for an employee’s disability if the
disability is obvious, regardless of whether the employee
requests an accommodation or not.
The case, Brady v.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., involved a nineteen-year-old man with
cerebral palsy. His disability rendered him noticeably slower in
walking, speaking, eating and seeing as well as impairing other
cognitive and motor functions. However, he had worked for two years
in a local pharmacy receiving and dispensing prescriptions without
incident. He applied for a similar position, classified as
“Salesfloor Associate,” with Wal-Mart in 2002 and was subsequently
hired. The Wal-Mart pharmacy supervisor testified that she thought
the plaintiff was too slow, appeared to have trouble matching
prescriptions, and that she knew something was wrong. Only a few
days after his hiring, the plaintiff’s job was changed to collecting
shopping carts and garbage in the parking lot. Shortly thereafter,
the plaintiff quit.
The plaintiff never
requested an accommodation and testified that he did not think he
needed one. However, the Second Circuit stated that a situation
like this, in which an employer perceives an employee to be
disabled, but the employee does not so perceive himself, actually
weighs against a requirement that the employee is responsible for
seeking an accommodation. In such a scenario, the employer is
obligated to engage in an “interactive process” with their employee
aimed at assessing whether the employee’s disability can be
reasonably accommodated. Prudent employers should consult with
legal counsel when dealing with an employee who appears to be having
work-related difficulty due to an obvious disability.
Minimum Wage
Increase Reminder: The second of three increases to the federal
minimum wage will take effect on July 24, 2008, when the federal
minimum wage rises from $5.85 per hour to $6.55 per hour. Most
states have passed their own minimum wage law, and many of the
states have minimum wages that differ from the federal rate (North
Carolina’s minimum wage is currently $6.15). Because the federal
law covers nearly all employees, making most employers subject to
both state and federal laws, employers may effectively ensure
compliance with both sets of laws simply by following the one that
is most beneficial to the employee.
For more information
on these topics or other employment law related issues, please
contact
Andy Petesch at 919.783.1078 or
apetesch@poynerspruill.com or
Susie Gibbons
at
sgibbons@poynerspruill.com or 919.783.2813.