| |
|
Recent Case Challenges Mandatory Requirement
That Employees Use Paid Leave During FMLA
(March 12, 2007) |
Employers routinely require employees out on family medical
leave to exhaust paid leave such as sick and vacation concurrent
with their FMLA leave. The purpose of this requirement is to
prevent extension of the 12 weeks allowed by Family Medical
Leave Act (“the Act”) with unused paid leave time. This
practice has not been the subject of litigation until now. Last
week, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the
employer in Reba v. Roadway Express, Inc. in a case involving
this kind of mandatory use of paid leave.
The employee in Reba v. Roadway Express needed approximately six
weeks off from work due to a serious health condition. She was
granted FMLA leave for her absence, and pursuant to its regular
policy, the employer required her to use all her accrued vacation
and sick leave. The employee received $300 per week from a state
run disability program. She claimed the employer violated the Act
by requiring her to use accrued sick and vacation during her FMLA
leave.
T he
language of the Act clearly allows employers to require
concurrent use of paid leave time during an FMLA leave: an
”employee may elect, or an employer may require the employee, to
substitute any of the accrued paid vacation leave, personal
leave, or family leave of the employee for leave provided” under
the FMLA. 29 U.S.C. § 2612(d)(2). This section of the Act is
more broadly worded than the Department of Labor regulations,
which address only two situations in which an FMLA leave is not
“unpaid.” 29 C.F.R. § 825.207(d)(1) says that when an employee
is on temporary disability leave under an employer’s plan, the
provision for substitution of paid leave is inapplicable.
Similarly, 29 C. F. R. § 825.207(d)(1) indicates that the
substitution of paid leave is inapplicable during a worker’s
compensation leave because such leave is not “unpaid.” However,
the regulations do not directly address whether an FMLA leave
during which an employee receives benefits from a program that
is not sponsored by the employer constitutes a “paid” or
“unpaid” leave.
Roadway Express argued that since it did not
sponsor the disability benefit, the leave was unpaid, and it should
be allowed to compel the employee to use accrued vacation and sick
leave concurrent with her FMLA leave. Roadway also argued that any
regulatory effort to prevent the substitution of paid leave was an
impermissible narrowing of the statute, and therefore the regulation
was invalid. The Court rejected these arguments. Significantly,
Roadway had not challenged the regulation’s validity before the
trial court, and the Court of Appeals therefore refused to consider
that argument. This means that it is still an open question whether
an employer can compel the mandatory use of paid leave allotments
during an FMLA leave where the employee is also receiving benefits
from some third party. However, prudent employers should examine
their practices, and determine whether there are circumstances in
which employees could be on FMLA leave while receiving benefits from
some source other than an employer sponsored program, and should
make a conscious choice whether the company wants to insist that
vacation and sick leave run concurrent with the FMLA leave in those
situations.
If you have any questions regarding this alert or other employment
law issues, please contact
Susie Gibbons at 919.783.2813 or
sgibbons@poynerspruill.com.
|
|
|
 |
|