In This Issue - Click here to view a PDF
of the newsletter.
HR CORNER - Collective Actions Seeking Unpaid Wages
and Overtime Pay Are on the Rise
Advanced Directives Update
HR CORNER - Collective Actions Seeking Unpaid Wages
and Overtime Pay Are on the Rise
By
Kevin Ceglowski
Most
employers are aware that the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”)
requires them to pay at least minimum wage for all hours worked and to
pay overtime for hours worked over forty within a week to employees who
are not exempt from the FLSA’s requirements. Although these rules seem
simple, employers are increasingly being challenged under the FLSA based
on the way they count hours worked and on their decisions to classify
employees as exempt from overtime requirements.
Long
term care providers have not been exempt from recent wage and hour
litigation. For example, employees of Augustine Home Health Care, Inc.,
recently sued the company for failing to record their overtime hours
properly and failing to pay them at the overtime rate in violation of
the FLSA. The plaintiffs were all CNAs who were paid hourly for work
they did at nursing homes, assisted living centers, and in home health
care settings. They alleged that Augustine engaged in a company-wide
practice of refusing to pay overtime to CNAs who worked more than 40
hours per week.
A
large Southeastern provider doing business in North Carolina was
recently sued by an employee who sought to bring other employees into
the case. The defendant employer routinely contracts with health care
facilities, such as nursing facilities and assisted living communities,
to provide various health care related services to patients in those
facilities. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant employer engaged in
a company-wide practice of failing to pay its employees proper minimum
wage and overtime because the company automatically deducted a 30-minute
meal period from employees’ wages. Although the plaintiff was not
successful in turning her individual claim into a class action, this
case illustrates the growing trend of employees not being satisfied with
making individual claims, but seeking to “up the ante” by filing class
or collective actions.
Over
the past two years, we have seen a significant increase in large-scale
wage and hour suits. Many collective and class actions have been filed
against large and small employers seeking unpaid wages and overtime.
Such suits can be quite costly for employers because, in addition to
unpaid wages, employers face the risk of liquidated damages and
attorneys’ fees if a violation of the FLSA is proven. These
multi-plaintiff actions also pose a substantially greater risk to
employers because they present claims of large groups of employees.
Defending these claims requires more time and greater cost and
attorneys’ fees than does a single plaintiff case.
Because multiparty wage and hour lawsuits are on the rise, prudent
employers should examine their payroll practices to make sure they have
properly classified all employees as exempt or non-exempt and that they
are recording and paying wages for all time worked by their employees.
It does not cost much to conduct a self-audit, particularly in light of
the substantial cost and risk of defending a class action.
Kevin Ceglowski is an associate in our Employment Law Group. He
represents employers in employment discrimination, wrongful discharge,
and ERISA claims, and advises and defends clients in race, age,
disability, and sex discrimination and harassment cases before
administrative agencies and in state and federal courts. Kevin also
provides guidance to ensure employment practices are in full compliance
with all applicable statutes and regulations. He may be reached at
kceglowski@poynerspruill.com or 919.783.2853. You may also contact
Susie
Gibbons, Employment Law Practice Group Leader, regarding employment
law-related issues at
sgibbons@poynerspruill.com or 919.783.2813.
Top
Advanced
Directives Update
By
Ken Burgess
North Carolina’s revised advance directives
laws, summarized in the May 2007 and August/September 2007 issues of
Shorts, became effective October 1, 2007. The new laws affect North
Carolina’s statutes governing health care powers of attorney, living
wills, and the procedure for withholding life-sustaining care in the
absence of a formal advance directive. The new laws also authorize the
creation and use of a new medical directive, called a Medical Order for
Scope of Treatment (MOST), which is a medical order executed by a
physician with consent of the patient or patient’s surrogate. The MOST
form is similar to a Universal Do Not Resuscitate Order in that it is
portable and travels with a patient from one health care setting to
another. However, the MOST form is broader in scope than the Universal
DNR form because it addresses potential care issues beyond
resuscitation.
A number of initiatives are now under way to
help providers and citizens understand and implement the new laws. Some
of the more important of those initiatives are described below.
-
Several North Carolina health care
associations and provider groups are working together to develop
statewide training and education initiatives for the provider
community. The group includes long term care providers, physicians,
hospitals, hospice and home health providers, and emergency medical
services organizations, among others. The group has met only once so
far to organize and begin discussing the most efficient methods of
developing and disseminating information regarding the new laws. The
goal of the group is to develop consistent statewide training and
education materials so that all provider groups have and can share
the same information, while still allowing each provider group to
address issues unique to their care setting. Poyner & Spruill is
among the participants in this group.
-
The new MOST form is still under
development at the Department of Health and Human Services, but is
expected to be ready for distribution and use by mid-October. The
form will be available only through one or more designated agencies
and/or organizations (probably the N.C. Office of Emergency
Management Services like the current Universal DNR form) since the
MOST form is completed by a physician or physician extender,
consistent with their licensing laws, and unlike other types of
advance directives is not completed by the patient. It is, however,
signed by the patient or a patient’s representative.
We will continue to keep you posted in
future issues on new developments in implementation of these revised
laws.
Top |