related information

Industries
Related Publications
 publications full of ideas
 
CMS Requires Certain Hospitals to Disclose Physician Financial Relationships Under Stark Law 
Corridors - News for North Carolina Hospitals

03.01.2008

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is conducting a mandatory review of physician investment and compensation arrangements at 500 hospitals to determine whether they are in compliance with the Stark law governing physician self-referrals. The selected hospitals are required to report information to CMS about physician investment, ownership and compensation arrangements on a new Disclosure of Financial Relationships Report (DFRR) within 60 days of the letter from CMS. A hospital’s late response can lead to civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 per day. The accuracy of a hospital’s DFRR must be certified by the hospital’s CEO, CFO or comparable officer. This requirement should remind all Medicare-participating hospitals, whether or not they are required by CMS at this stage to submit a DFRR, of the need to track and ensure the legality of financial relationships with physicians.

Background

The Stark II law authorizes the Secretary of HHS to require hospitals and other entities furnishing more than 20 Medicare-reimbursed services during a calendar year to provide the Secretary or OIG with information concerning the hospital’s reportable financial relationships between a physician (or his or her immediate family member) and the entity. This information includes the covered services provided by the hospital and the names and unique physician identification numbers of all physicians with a financial interest in the entity. The term “financial interest” in this context includes ownership, investment or compensation arrangements. Although CMS indicated in the proposed Stark II regulations issued in January 1998 that it intended to require annual reports from hospitals of financial relationships with referring physicians, the final rules issued in 2004 merely required hospitals to furnish such information upon request.

The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 required CMS to consider the issue of annual disclosure of information concerning physician ownership and investment interest in specialty hospitals. Consequently, CMS in 2006 sent a survey to approximately 450 specialty and general acute care hospitals to obtain a more complete picture of the proportionality of physician investment in specialty hospitals. Because CMS did not receive sufficient information from this voluntary survey, it has made the new DFRR mandatory and will use it to analyze investment and compensation arrangements for compliance with the Stark law and regulations. In this phase, CMS will target the 290 hospitals that did not respond to the 2006 survey, as well as 210 additional hospitals selected from across the country.

Although the DFRR was to be sent out to these 500 hospitals in September of 2007, a hospital’s failure to receive such a request last year does not protect it from scrutiny in the future. CMS has stated that it will use the information collected in this process to design a regular financial disclosure process applicable to all Medicare-participating hospitals in the future. While CMS estimated that completion of the DFRR will take approximately six hours by hospital accounting personnel, industry groups including the American Hospital Association cite this as extremely low and unrealistic in light of the large amount of information being requested.

Information Solicited by DFRR Through eight worksheets to be completed, the mandatory DFRR solicits a wide range of information. The first six worksheets pertain only to hospitals with physician ownership or investment and therefore apply only to specialty hospitals or other closely held entities with physician ownership. On the other hand, the two final worksheets apply to any hospital, including nonprofit, municipally owned or any other type of hospital with one or more compensation arrangements with physicians unless an exception applies. The required information includes the following:

  • The general characteristics of the hospital, including a copy of the hospital’s independently audited financial statements, if available, or other financial statements.
  • Any direct ownership interest in the hospital by any person, any indirect ownership by an entity, and the percentage of ownership interest and type of stock held. In the case of an investing entity, the form must also identify each investor or owner of the entity and the percentage of his or her ownership in the entity. Any individual investor, either a direct or indirect owner, must be identified as a physician or physician’s immediate family member if applicable. A separate worksheet must be completed for each physician owner or immediate family member with his or her Social Security number or Medicare National Provider Identifier (NPI) and certain other information.
  • Any payments made to the hospital by direct or indirect physician owners of the hospital, including without limitation initial investments, assessments, capital calls and loan guarantees, as well as the date, type and amount of payment. In cases of indirect ownership, the individuals who make up the investing entity must also be identified, as well as their status (such as a physician or an immediate family member). Any guarantee or other agreement that reduces or limits the physician’s risk of loss or liability must also be reported.
  • The following compensation arrangements between a hospital and physicians must be reported: all rentals of office space or equipment to or from the hospital and the physician; personal service arrangements; physician recruitment payments; a copy of each such agreement must be produced (but only one copy of a uniform personal services agreement needs to be supplied); isolated transactions such as a physician’s sale of property or practice; any compensation to a physician unrelated to a designated health service under Stark; any other payments by a physician to the hospital for items or services; charitable donations by a physician; nonmonetary compensation to physicians in the form of items or services exceeding $300 per physician per calendar year; incidental benefits valued at $25 or more per occurrence granted to medical staff members; any higher return paid on a physician’s invested capital than is warranted by the amount invested; loans or loan guarantees made by either the hospital or physician on behalf of the other; and any initial investments, capital calls or other payments made by the hospital on behalf of a physician.
  • Financial relationships permitted by Stark that apparently need not be reported on the DFRR are those relating to physician employment agreements, risk-sharing compensation agreements, compliance training, obstetrical malpractice insurance subsidies, professional courtesy, retention payments and community-wide health information systems.

 The DFRR represents a significant change in CMS’s enforcement policy under the Stark law and increases the risk of scrutiny for both hospitals and physicians. It creates potentially new liabilities based on a hospital’s late submission of the DFRR and incomplete or inaccurate statements. If a hospital has not yet done so, it should examine all contracts or investment arrangements with physicians and evaluate its contract management systems to ensure compliance with Stark II requirements. If a hospital’s compliance plan does not already require collecting and reviewing this information through a legal audit of its physician agreements, then the hospital is strongly urged to do so in anticipation of CMS’s future adoption of an industry-wide mandatory disclosure program for hospitals.

 

Physical Address: 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601
Communication Agreement

I understand and agree that Poyner Spruill LLP will have no obligation to keep confidential the information that I am now sending to the firm.