Sign Up Created with Sketch. Want to receive our thought leadership?     Sign Up

There are many clear benefits in performing background checks, such as screening out candidates who give incomplete or inaccurate information on their application, or are not suitable for the job due to relevant criminal convictions. However, notwithstanding these benefits, some employer background checks have been challenged as discriminatory under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because they disproportionately screen out particular racial, ethnic or gender groups.

A case in point is the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (“EEOC”) lawsuit against BMW Manufacturing Co. LLC (“BMW”) claiming that BMW’s criminal background check policy is discriminatory. In this ongoing litigation, the EEOC has questioned the legality of BMW’s policy because it allegedly has resulted in the termination of a large number of employees – many of whom were black. Several of those employees had been employed as contractors providing services to BMW for many years without any problems. These same employees had previously passed the contracting company’s criminal background check and were re-screened as a result of BMW changing contracting companies. The EEOC has alleged that BMW’s criminal conviction policy considers all past crimes, no matter how long ago they occurred and made no distinction between misdemeanor and felony convictions.

As a result of the EEOC’s aggressive litigation posture, as illustrated by the BMW case, prudent employers should consider the following when implementing background checks:

The results of the background checks and the information requested should be kept confidential at all times, should only be used for the limited and intended purpose, and should only be distributed to the proper human resources manager or individual who maintains all such records. If questions arise about background checks, employers may wish to consult with legal counsel.

◀︎ Back to Thought Leadership