Work in the Time of COVID-19: FAQs for Employers

It seems like there is a new challenge to the standing requirements for zoning matters in North Carolina on a regular basis, and yet the appellate courts consistently hold the line on the requirement that challengers allege special damages that are distinct from the rest of the community in a particularized and supportable way. In the most recent Court of Appeals decision on the pleading requirements for standing in zoning cases in North Carolina, Hoag v. Pitt County, the Court declined the opportunity to knock down that standing barrier.

In a contributed article published by the North Carolina Bar Association’s Government and Public Sector Section, Nick Tosco examines the implications of the Hoag decision on the likelihood of appellate courts to look past the standing requirements.

To read the full article visit, North Carolina Bar Association

◀︎ Back to All News
What you Need to Know

Recent News

News

The FCC Won’t Let Me Be: A Chat with Federal Communications Commission General Counsel Thomas M. Johnson, Jr.

September 29, 2020
Read More
News

Gul and Slipsky Summarize Important Data Sharing Ruling in North Carolina Lawyers Weekly

September 21, 2020
Read More
News

Poyner Spruill welcomes Nia Doaks and Sarah Fritsch

September 16, 2020
Read More
News

Saad Gul Talks Formation of new Muslim Bar Association with North Carolina Lawyers Weekly

September 4, 2020
Read More