Poyner Spruill Welcomes Education Law Practice Group

Email Notice

Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any legal matter until we authorize you to do so. To initiate a possible representation, call the professional at the listed telephone number.

By clicking the “ACCEPT” button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that, even if you submit information that you consider confidential in an effort to retain us, our review of that information will not create an obligation on us to keep it confidential and will not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the “ACCEPT” button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

Accept close

Dan Cahill

Raleigh, NC t: 919.783.2902 f: 919.783.1075
Charlotte, NC

Dan is the firm's Managing Partner and, in this capacity, Dan serves as the Chair of the firm's Management Committee. He is also the firm's assistant general counsel and loss prevention partner.

Read Dan's articles


Dan, a life-long Raleigh resident, has spent over 22 years representing corporations in all types of commercial disputes in state and federal court, and through alternative dispute resolution. In that time, Dan also spent eight years working in-house with a client as a staff attorney in their legal department.  This experience lends to his ability to understand clients’ business needs and advocate for them as both a litigator and firm leader.

He focuses his practice on complex commercial disputes, representing banks and financial institutions – in all types of litigation, including lender liability claims and challenges to mortgage collateral; commercial landlords; and construction companies – in litigation and with contract revision.

Areas of Focus


Savage v. Zelent – We represented Mr. Savage in having a Scottish judgment recognized and enforced in North Carolina.  Mr. Savage obtained a judgment for $225,025.37 (£148,516.75) in Inverness Sheriff Court in Scotland under the Family Law (Scotland) Act of 2006.  Ms. Zelent had filed suit in Scotland, alleging she sustained economic disadvantage as a result of her relationship with Mr. Savage.  The Scottish court ruled against her and awarded a judgment in favor of Mr. Savage for the fees and expenses he incurred in defending the suit.  After Ms. Zelent moved to North Carolina, Mr. Savage sought to domesticate the judgment in North Carolina.  The trial court ruled in favor of Mr. Savage, holding that the Scottish judgment should be recognized and enforced in North Carolina under the North Carolina Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act.  Ms. Zelent appealed to the Court of Appeals in a case of first impression in North Carolina.  Following oral argument, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court decision in a 3-0 published decision.  Ms. Zelent filed a petition for discretionary review with the North Carolina Supreme Court, which was denied.

Pete Fortner, PLLC v. Koonce, Wooten & Haywood, LLP, 713 S.E. 2nd 793 (2011) – We successfully represented an accounting firm in a suit by a competitor for claims including tortious interference with contract and unfair trade practices. The trial court initially dismissed three claims and later granted summary judgment on the tortious interference and unfair trade claims. The North Carolina Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the trial court.

North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (2005) – Obtained verdict in excess of $3 million for landowner in highway condemnation action.

P.R. Chunk, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (2004) – Co-counsel for Martin Marietta in patent royalty dispute where plaintiff initially sought $496,000,000. Jury awarded plaintiff $0. Trial verdict affirmed by Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. P.R. Chunk, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5812 (4th Cir. 2006).

Visit our Litigation page   ▶

+Financial Transactions Litigation



Wake Forest University, JD, 1994

University of North Carolina, BA in Public Policy Analysis, 1989

+Notable Accomplishments

Recognized in Business North Carolina magazine’s “Legal Elite” (Litigation), 2009 – 2010, 2014 and 2018

AV Rated, Martindale Hubbell®

Ranked among Super Lawyers magazine’s North Carolina “Super Lawyers” (Business Litigation), 2010-2015, 2017-2018

Recognized as “2010 Law Impact Leader” by Business Leader magazine

Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® (Commercial Litigation) 2014-2017, 2021

+Professional & Community Activities

National Association of CEOs, Member 2017-present

St. Michael’s Episcopal Church, Vestry 2016-present

Note in the Pocket, Board of Directors 2013-present

St. Timothy’s School, Board of Trustees 2012-present

Artspace, Board of Directors, 2009 – 2015; Chair 2012-2013

North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys

Defense Research Institute (DRI)

North Carolina Bar Association

Leadership Raleigh Graduate, Class of 2006

Here for you

Contact Dan

What you Need to Know

Read Recommended Articles

◀︎ All Professionals